Linthicum v. Butterfield, No. B199645A - California Case Law
California Case Law - The FindLaw California Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal Opinion Summaries Blog

Linthicum v. Butterfield, No. B199645A

In a dispute between owners of neighboring parcels involving the use of a roadway, trial court judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded where: 1) the trial court balanced all the hardships and acted within its discretion in denying the injunction; 2) the court did not err in failing to award damages; 3) the court's decision is remanded so that the trial court can clarify their judgment with regard to the width of the easement and roadway; 4) the court's erred in granting judgment against plaintiff on their second cause of action to quiet title; and 5) the trial court properly held that that the Bjorklunds' Code of Civil Procedure section 998 offer is valid.   

Read Linthicum v. Butterfield, No. B199645A in PDF

Read Linthicum v. Butterfield, No. B199645A in HTML

Appellate Information
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX
Filed June 24, 2009

Judges
Before: GILBERT, P.J., YEGAN, J., PERREN, J.
Opinion by GILBERT, J.