Mednik v. State Dept. of Health Care Serv., No. B193269 - - California Case Law
California Case Law - The FindLaw California Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal Opinion Summaries Blog

Mednik v. State Dept. of Health Care Serv., No. B193269

Trial court order denying plaintiff's petition for writ of mandate is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff's exclusion from the Medi-Cal program amounted to disbarment and he therefore has a liberty interest at stake; 2) plaintiff has not identified any aspect of the administrative appeal procedure in connection with his temporary suspension and denial of reenrollment which fell short of the demands of due process; and 3) there is no support for plaintiff's allegation that the trial court lacked the complete administrative record.   

Read Mednik v. State Dept. of Health Care Serv., No. B193269 in PDF

Read Mednik v. State Dept. of Health Care Serv., No. B193269 in HTML

Appellate Information
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Dzintra Janavs, Judge. Affirmed.
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR
Filed: June 30, 2009

Judges
Before EPSTEIN, P.J., WILLHITE, J., SUZUKAWA, J.
Opinion by EPSTEIN, P.J.

Counsel
For Plaintiff: Landau & Landau, Bruce G. Landau; Law Office of Laura Seraso and Laura Seraso.
For Defendant: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Douglas M. Press, Assistant Attorney General, Richard T. Waldow, Erin S. Kubota and Gala E. Dunn, Deputy Attorneys General.