Clement v. Alegre, No. A123168 - - California Case Law
California Case Law - The FindLaw California Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal Opinion Summaries Blog

Clement v. Alegre, No. A123168

Trials court's imposition of discovery sanctions against plaintiffs for interposing objections to special interrogatories propounded by defendants is affirmed as sanctions were warranted where plaintiffs' objection to the term "economic damages" was without substantial justification and their responses to those interrogatories were evasive.   

Read Clement v. Alegre, No. A123168

Appellate Information

Filed September 23, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Kline

Counsel

For Appellant:  Samuel Goldstein & Associates, Samuel Elliot Goldstein, Law Offices of Stephanie J. Finelli, Stephanie Finelli

For Appelle:  Belzer, Hulchiy & Murray, Nicholas P. Hulchiy, Steven Barry Piser.