Hearn v. Howard, No. B208782 - California Case Law
California Case Law - The FindLaw California Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal Opinion Summaries Blog

Hearn v. Howard, No. B208782

In a claim for legal malpractice, trial court's denial of defendant's motion to vacate entry of default and a default judgment against her on the complaint filed by the plaintiffs is affirmed as there is no basis to conclude that the trial court abused its discretion.  However, the judgment is modified to omit $15,000 in attorney fees because that amount was not specified in the complaint.   

Read Hearn v. Howard, No. B208782

Appellate Information

Filed September 23, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Todd

Counsel

For Appellant:  Lisa M. Howard, in pro. per

For Appelle:  Parker Shumaker Mills and Howard M. Fields