Chavez v. City of Los Angeles, No. S162313 - Employment Law - California Case Law
California Case Law - The FindLaw California Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal Opinion Summaries Blog

Chavez v. City of Los Angeles, No. S162313

In plaintiff's action under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), court of appeals' reversal of trial court's denial of plaintiff's motion seeking an attorney's fee award of $870,935.50 is reversed where: 1) Code Civ. Proc. section 1033(a), interpreted according to its plain meaning, gives a trial court discretion to deny attorney's fees to a plaintiff who prevails on a FEHA claim but recovers an amount that could have been recovered in a limited civil case; and 2) in light of plaintiff's minimal success and grossly inflated attorney's fee request, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying attorney's fees.     

Read Chavez v. City of Los Angeles, No. S162313 [HTML]

Read Chavez v. City of Los Angeles, No. S162313 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed January 14, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Kennard

Counsel
For Appellant:   Law Office of Rochelle Evans Jackson, Rochelle Evans Jackson; Law Office of Melinda G. Wilson and Melinda G. Wilson

For Appellee:   Rockard J. Delgadillo, City Attorney, Paul L. Winnemore and Beth D. Orellana, Deputy City Attorneys