In an action wherein plaintiff-insurer sought a declaration that defendant's underlying claims involving unsolicited faxes were not covered by policies as "advertising injury" or "property damage," summary judgment in favor of defendant is affirmed where the claims asserted in the Illinois actions were not covered by the State Farm policies. Also, defendant's appeal from an order denying its motion to quash service of the complaint is rejected as such as order not is not appealable where, as here, the party contesting jurisdiction enters a general appearance and litigates the merits.
Filed January 26, 2010
Opinion by Judge Manella
For Appellant: Law Offices of Ryan G. Richardson, Ryan G. Richardson; Law Offices of Leah Nico and Phillip A. Bock