In a petition for review of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) partial denial of a credit against charges for future transmission service to Petitioner utilities, the petition is dismissed where Petitioners lacked standing because FERC's remedy did not actually require the utilities to issue transmission credits.
Argued November 14, 2008
Decided July 7, 2009
Opinion by Judge Griffith
Ashley C. Parrish, Duncan, Weinberg, Genzer & Pembroke P.C., Washington, DC
Samuel I. Soopper, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
Cynthia A. Marlette, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC