In an action to enjoin further implementation of a police checkpoint program in Defendant city, the denial of a preliminary injunction is reversed, where the checkpoint did not meet the Fourth Amendment's requirement of individualized suspicion.
Argued May 8, 2009
Decided July 10, 2009
Opinion by Judge Sentelle
Mara E. Verheyden-Hilliard, Washington, DC
Todd S. Kim, Solicitor General, Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Washington, DC