Defendant's wire fraud conviction and sentence are affirmed, where: 1) there was ample evidence in the record from which the jury could reasonably infer that defendant was a knowing participant in the unlawful scheme to obtain the property at issue; and 2) the district court did not err in its calculation of loss.
Argued April 9, 2009
Decided August 7, 2009
Opinion by Judge Griffith
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Rogers
Richard K. Gilbert, Washington, DC
Florence Y. Pan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Washington, DC