In an action seeking rescission of defendant's life insurance policy, judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) the district court properly determined that no timely jury demand was filed and served by either party with respect to the only issue before it on remand; and 2) the district court did not err in concluding the term "annual income" in the policy was ambiguous.
Read Mega Life & Health Ins. Co. v. Pieniozek, No. 08-14414
Appellate Information
Filed October 19, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Dowd
