In plaintiff's suit against the Navy brought under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals denying plaintiff's claim for additional costs incurred in connection with is contract to perform roofing work at a Naval facility is reversed and remanded as, plaintiff's interpretation of the contract as requiring waterproofing paint of the parapet walls was within the zone of reasonableness, and plaintiff is entitled to compensation for the additional costs incurred.
Appeal from: Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals
Decided December 7, 2009
Opinion by Newman, Circuit Judge
For Appellant: David W. Lannetti, Vandeventer Black LLP
For Appellee: Jane C. Dempsey, US Department of Justice, Commerical Litigation Branch