District court's grant of defendant's motion to suppress majority of the evidence on grounds of Fourth Amendment violation is reversed as the officer's original request for defendant's identification and the first few follow-up questions did not unreasonably extend the duration of the stop and were justified based on officer safety concerns.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Decided October 15, 2009
Opinion by: Gibson, Circuit Judge
For Appellant: William E. Morse
For Appellee: Robert Herrick