Conviction of defendant for drug-trafficking conspiracy is affirmed where: 1) district court did not err in concluding that the omission or misstatement of information of an informant's activities did not provide grounds for suppression; and 2) district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to require the government to produce documents containing identifying information as to the other informants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Decided January 29, 2010
Opinion by Circuit Judge Torruella
For Appellant: Alan D. Rose, Rose, Chinitz & Rose
For Appellee: Kelly Begg Lawrence, Assistant United States Attorney, Michael K. Loucks, Acting United States Attorney