Defendant's carjacking conviction is affirmed, where the District Court did not err in refusing to suppress his post-arrest statements, because no evidence suggested that the arresting officer's provision of a statement of charges was anything other than an action normally attendant to arrest and custody.
Argued: May 15, 2009
Decided: July 2, 2009
Opinion by Judge Traxler
Kenneth Wendell Ravenell, Baltimore, MD