Defendant's carjacking conviction is affirmed, where the District Court did not err in refusing to suppress his post-arrest statements, because no evidence suggested that the arresting officer's provision of a statement of charges was anything other than an action normally attendant to arrest and custody.
Appellate Information
Argued: May 15, 2009
Decided: July 2, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Traxler
Counsel
For Appellant:
Kenneth Wendell Ravenell, Baltimore, MD
For Appellee:
John Francis Purcell, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD
586zwe2tvy
