Kamm v. ITEX Corp., No. 07-35079 - Contract Law - U.S. Ninth Circuit
U.S. Ninth Circuit - The FindLaw 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion Summaries Blog

Kamm v. ITEX Corp., No. 07-35079

In a breach of contract action concerning an Independent Retail Brokerage Service Agreement, the District Court's order remanding the action to state court is affirmed, as Plaintiffs' motion to remand was based on a forum selection clause and thus was not subject to the thirty-day requirement of 28 U.S.C. section 1447(c).

Read the full decision in Kamm v. ITEX Corporation, No. 07-35079.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding.

Judges:

Before William A. Fletcher and Raymond C. Fisher, CircuitJudges, and Charles R. Breyer, District Judge. The Honorable Charles R. Breyer, UnitedStates District Judge for the
Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion by Judge Fletcher.

Counsel:

Stephen A. Redshaw, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, Oregon, for the appellant.

Christopher L. Garrett, Perkins Coie LLP, Portland, Oregon, for the appellees.