In a capital habeas matter, the denial of Petitioner's petition is affirmed, where Petitioner was not prejudiced by any of his counsel's alleged errors during the sentencing phase of his trial, because there was no reasonable probability that the sentencing judge would have reached a different result in the absence of the alleged errors.
Argued and Submitted March 26, 2009
Filed July 1, 2009
Opinion by Judge Gould
Terry Goddard, Office of the Attorney General for Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
J.D. Nielsen, Office of the Attorney General for Arizona, Phoenix, AZ