Defendant's conviction for malicious interference with a military radio system is affirmed, where Defendant waived his right to counsel knowingly and intelligently, because the prosecutor did not err in including the potential sentencing enhancements in his calculation of the maximum possible penalty provided by law.
Argued and Submitted January 13, 2009
Filed July 10, 2009
Opinion by Judge Ikuta
Elizabeth A. Newman, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA
Daniel B. Levin, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA