Defendant's child pornography sentence is vacated in part, where a condition of defendant's supervised release stating that he could not access via computer any material that related to minors was overly broad, imposing a far greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary to achieve the legitimate goals of supervised release.
Argued and Submitted March 12, 2009
Filed August 13, 2009
Opinion by Judge Berzon
Thomas P. O'Brien, United States Attorney, Santa Ana, CA