Coto Settlement v. Eisenberg, No. 08-35966 - - U.S. Ninth Circuit
U.S. Ninth Circuit - The FindLaw 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion Summaries Blog

Coto Settlement v. Eisenberg, No. 08-35966

In an action claiming that plaintiff was entitled to part of an amount refunded by the Federal Trade Commission following a judgment against plaintiff and defendants, dismissal of the action as untimely is affirmed where defendant's actions in raising the reserve requirement of entities partially controlled by defendant gave rise to plaintiff's claims in 2000, and therefore the statute of limitations began to run at that time.

Read Coto Settlement v. Eisenberg, No. 08-35966

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted October 14, 2009

Filed January 29, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Cudahy

Counsel

For Appellant:

Ernst Leonard, Friedman & Feiger, L.L.P., Dallas, TX

For Appellees:

Derek A. Newman and Derek Linke, Newman & Newman, Attorneys at Law, Seattle, WA