In the EEOC's appeal from a denial of its petition to enforce an administrative subpoena issued to UPS seeking information about how religious exemptions to UPS's Uniform and Personal Appearance Guidelines were handled nationwide, the order is reversed where the district court, in finding that national information was not relevant to the charges being investigated by the EEOC, applied too restrictive a standard of relevance.
Argued: August 24, 2009
Decided: November 19, 2009
Julie L. Gantz, James L. Lee, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Washington, DC
Wendy Johnson Lario, Day Pitney LLP, Morristown, NJ