2nd Circuit Injury & Tort Law News - U.S. Second Circuit
U.S. Second Circuit - The FindLaw 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion Summaries Blog

Recently in Injury & Tort Law Category

More than a dozen years after the 9/11 terror attacks, memories are stirred almost monthly as 9/11-related litigation continues to make its way through the courts. In the latest development, the Second Circuit reversed the district court, essentially bringing Saudi Arabia back into the mix.

Factual and Procedural Background

There are many 9/11 cases in the judicial system. This particular case involves two: In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al.) ("Terrorist Attacks") and Doe v. Bin Laden. Both cases are brought by plaintiffs seeking damages from Saudi Arabia, and Afghanistan, respectively for injuries and death resulting from the 9/11 attacks.

Though twelve years have passed from that fateful day on September 11, 2001, for any New Yorker present that day, the heartbreaking sight of the World Trade Center towers collapsing, the stench of death and destruction, and the eerie silence looming over New York City, can be recalled in an instant.

Last week, memories of 9/11 came to the forefront as the Second Circuit affirmed a district court's decision dismissing Con Edison's negligence claims against the owners, and contractors, of 7WTC, stemming from the tragic events of that day.

Back in July, SAC Capital was indicted on five counts of insider trading, just two weeks after the S.E.C. filed a civil case against SAC Capital billionaire hedge fund manager Steven Cohen. Today, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York announced a plea agreement between the DOJ and SAC Capital, reports Reuters.

J.P. Morgan the longtime teacher's pet, usually found sitting across from the President at meetings, has in a symbolic shift, been relegated to the corner, reports The Wall Street Journal (subscription only). This figurative demotion comes presumably as a result of civil investigations into the mortgage-backed securities that caused, in large part, the financial crisis of 2008.

That hasn't tarnished J.P. Morgan's reputation among investors and analysts however, as two-thirds of the mortgage-bond liability arise from Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual, which J.P. Morgan acquired in 2008 after strong encouragement by U.S. regulators, according the Journal. But one analyst stated: "JPMorgan took it on the chin," reports Bloomberg.

The government may be in a partial shutdown, but the Second Circuit is alive and well, with two cases with big repercussions making moves in the judicial system.

State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition v. Rowland

On Friday, Connecticut officials submitted a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court, asking it to review a Second Circuit decision that could have a national ripple effect on the relationship between state governments and their unionized work force, reports The Associated Press.

Denny's Could be Responsible for Drunken Attack: 2nd Cir.

Earlier this month, the Second Circuit ruled that a woman who was attacked by rowdy drunken customers at a Denny's restaurant in New York could bring a negligence claim against the restaurant.

In 2008, Kelly Gray sued the Denny's Corp and the attackers in connection with the late-night incident at a Denny's seeking compensatory, exemplary, and punitive damages. Gray was dining at the restaurant when a group of other visibly drunk patrons began acting rowdy and aggressive.

Whether you're into zombies, monsters or superheroes, the news coming out of the Second Circuit reads more like updates from Comic Con than a Court of Appeals. In just a matter of days, the Second Circuit decided a case against B-Movie impresario Troma, and suspended trial deadlines pending a settlement in a Marvel case.

Though apartheid ended in 1994, the wounds are still deep. In what's been over a decade of litigation, South African nationals initiated a lawsuit in 2002 against American companies with subsidiaries in South Africa. The plaintiffs claimed that through their subsidiaries, the American companies aided and abetted the South African government in the violation of international laws by carrying out the apartheid regime.

Putting an end to this politically-fused litigation, the Second Circuit reiterated the Supreme Court's latest holding, that the plaintiffs' claims were barred.

The Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station ("Vermont Yankee") has been a source of controversy -- and litigation -- since 1978. In the latest court battle, Vermont Yankee brought suit against Vermont's Governor, Attorney General and members of the Vermont Public Services board making preemption and dormant commerce clause claims.

Last week, in a case that is sure to have nationwide ripples, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that "[s]tates cannot shut down nuclear power plants over safety worries, reports The New York Times.

Privacy. So highly regarded, yet so easily disregarded.

Today, the Second Circuit handed down a decision giving a clear warning to companies reselling personal information under the Driver's Privacy Protection Act ("DPPA"). Get ready to let your clients know to call their web designers -- some of their drop down menus may have to go.

Let's back track a little to see where exactly the Second Circuit drew the line in the sand.