In an Indian tribe's action seeking injunctive relief from Michigan's policy of taxing transactions involving the tribe and from Michigan's reliance on an informal refund process to sort those immunities out on a case-by-case basis, judgment for Defendant is reversed, where the questions presented covered a myriad of hypothetical transactions and were too abstract and unsupported by specific facts.
Argued April 30, 2009
Decided and Filed June 26, 2009
Opinion by Judge Merritt
Vernle Charles Durocher, Jr., Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, MN