District court's post-judgment order denying defendant's motion for a sentence reduction is affirmed as the appeal lacked merit and 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2) is not a vehicle for convicts to raise unrelated sentencing challenges that they had previously overlooked or omitted.
Argued: April 23, 2009
Decided and Filed: September 28, 2009
Opinion by Chief Judge Batchelder
For Appellant: Sharon A. Turek, Federal Public Defender's Office
For Appellee: Mark V. Courtade, Assistant United States Attorney