Defendant's conviction for maliciously damaging a building by means of an explosive is affirmed where the introduction of recorded statements by officers who interrogated defendant constituted hearsay, but did not prejudice him because the evidence against him was overwhelming.
Filed August 4, 2009
Opinion by Judge Lucero
John K. Henderson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Wichita, KS
Donald Oakley, Assistant United States Attorney, Wichita, KS
Matthew T. Treaster, Assistant United States Attorney, Wichita, KS