Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Riverwatch v. County of San Diego Dep't of Envtl. Health, No. D049216

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on July 06, 2009 3:56 PM

Trial court judgment awarding plaintiffs attorney's fees pursuant to the private attorney general doctrine set forth in Code of Civil Procedure sec. 1021.5 is affirmed where: 1) the litigation initiated by plaintiffs satisfied the necessity and financial burden requirements of the statute; 2) court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the litigation conferred a significant benefit to the environment and thus to the public at large; and 3) the court did not err in finding that although it had not granted the petition in all respects, plaintiffs prevailed on three significant issues and were therefore successful within the meaning of the statute.    

Read Riverwatch v. County of San Diego Dep't of Envtl. Health, No. D049216 in PDF

Read Riverwatch v. County of San Diego Dep't of Envtl. Health, No. D049216 in HTML

Appellate Information
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Michael M. Anello, Judge. Affirmed.
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE
Filed June 12, 2009
Published July 2, 2009

Judges
Before: HUFFMAN, Acting P.J., HALLER, J., AARON, J.
Opinion by HUFFMAN, Acting P.J.

Counsel
For Appellant: Allen, Matkins, Leck, Gamble & Natsis, Patrick E. Breen, Mark J. Hattam, and Kathryn D. Horning.

For Respondent: Everett L. DeLano.

Find a Lawyer

More Options