Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Hinton v. Beck, No. C056911

By FindLaw Staff on August 26, 2009 4:53 PM

In a personal injury action, denial of an insurer's motion to intervene is affirmed where the insurer, having denied coverage and having refused to defend the action on behalf of its insured, did not have a direct and immediate interest to warrant intervention in the litigation.

Read Hinton v. Beck, No. C056911

Appellate Information

Filed August 25, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Blease

Counsel

For Appellants:

Lois A. Lindstrom, Ericksen, Arbuthnot, Kilduff, Day & Lindstrom, Walnut Creek, CA

Gregory A. Mase, Ericksen, Arbuthnot, Kilduff, Day & Lindstrom, Walnut Creek, CA

For Respondent:

John D. Barr, Barr & Mudford, Redding, CA

J. Michael Favor, Barr & Mudford, Redding, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options