Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

M.S. v. O.S., No. D053996

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on August 10, 2009 12:35 PM

In a paternity action, trial court order requiring defendant to pay child support is reversed and remanded where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in including his speculative bonus income in his gross annual income for purposes of calculating child support; and 2) the court abused its discretion by including his Indian tribe's payment of his attorney fees in his gross annual income under Family Code sec. 4058 (a) for purposes of the guideline support calculation, as the payments go directly to his attorneys and are not part of his income or cash flow available for child support, and thus may be considered only under Family Code sec. 4057 as a circumstance potentially warranting an upward departure from the guideline amount.    

Read M.S. v. O.S., No. D053996 in PDF

Read M.S. v. O.S., No. D053996 in HTML

Appellate Information
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Maureen F. Hallahan, Judge. Reversed with directions.
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE
Filed: August 7, 2009

Judges
Before MCCONNELL, P.J., O'ROURKE, J., AARON, J.
Opinion by MCCONNELL, P.J.

Counsel
For Appellant: Matthew M. Kremer and Stephen Temko.

For Respondent: M.S. in pro. per.

Find a Lawyer

More Options