Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

First Am. Title Ins. Co. v. XWarehouse Lending Corp., No. A119931

By FindLaw Staff on September 01, 2009 4:39 PM

In an action by an insurer seeking a declaration that plaintiff had no duty under its title insurance policies to defend or indemnify defendant, judgment for plaintiff is affirmed where defendant was not an insured under the policy because it was not a successor in ownership of the mortgage at issue.

Read First Am. Title Ins. Co. v. XWarehouse Lending Corp., No. A119931

Appellate Information

Filed August 28, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Siggins

Counsel

For Appellant:

Barry D. Hovis, Musick, Peeler & Garrett LLP, San Francisco, CA

Walter J.R. Traver, Musick, Peeler & Garrett LLP, San Francisco, CA

For Respondent:

Michael T. Fogarty, McDonough Holland & Allen, Sacramento, CA

Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options