Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Powers v. Pottery Barn, Inc., No. D054336

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on September 22, 2009 3:50 PM

In a consumer class action case against Pottery Barn, trial court ruling sustaining defendant's demurrer is reversed as the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971's regulation of what may be asked of credit card customers is not a regulation of what can be sent in commercial e-mails and is not in any manner specific to e-mail, and thus, Song-Beverly is not preempted by the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography And Marketing Act of 2003 (CAN-SPAM). 

Read Powers v. Pottery Barn, Inc., No. D054336

Appellate Information

Filed September 21, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Benke

Counsel

For Appellant:  Harrison Patterson O'Connor & Kinkead, James R. Patterson, Harry W. Harrison and Cary A. Kinkhead; Lindsay & Stonebarger, Gene J. Stonebarger, James M. Lindsay and Richard D. Lambert

For Appelle:  Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Phillip Craig Cardon and Elizabeth S. Berman

Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options