Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Williams v. Hilb, Rogal & Hobbs Insurance Serv., No. B203691

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on September 10, 2009 3:25 PM

In a negligence action against an insurance agency for failing to include workers compensation in the insurance package arising from a multimillion dollar judgment against plaintiff for injuries suffered by employee in a catastrophic fire, trial court's judgment is affirmed where: 1) the evidence amply supported the court's finding that defendant's employee failed to use the skill and care a reasonably careful insurance professional would have used in similar circumstances; 2) the action is not barred by the statute of limitations; and 3) the trial court did not err in refusing to assign fault to the plaintiff. 

Read Williams v. Hilb, Rogal & Hobbs Ins. Serv., No. B203691

Appellate Information

Filed September 9, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Bendix

Counsel

For Appellant: Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith and Roy G. Weatherup; Hinshaw & Culbertson and Frances M. O'Meara

For Appelle:  Vastano & Angarella, Patrick G. Vastano and Steven V. Angarella   

Find a Lawyer

More Options