Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Buesa v. City of Los Angeles, No. B212854

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on October 05, 2009 12:50 PM

In plaintiff-police officers' lawsuit against the city of Los Angeles under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (POBRA) claiming that a perjured declaration submitted by the city deprived them of their statute of limitations defense in an administrative mandamus proceeding over their discharges, judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendant is affirmed as plaintiffs' action under POBRA is barred because it constitutes an impermissible collateral attack on the mandate judgment. 

Read Buesa v. City of Los Angeles, No. B212854

Filed October 3, 2009


Opinion by Judge Epstein


For Appellant:  Law Office of David W. Allor and David W. Allor

For Appelle:  Rockard J. Delgadillo and Carmen Trutanich, City Attorneys, and Paul L. Winnemore, Deputy City Attorney

Find a Lawyer

More Options