Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

In re Marriage of Tejeda, No. H033001

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on November 30, 2009 11:21 AM

Trial court's order declaring plaintiff a putative spouse on the ground that the parties' marriage was invalid because the husband already had a wife when he married plaintiff is affirmed as, applying the unambiguous language of Family Code section 2251, the parties' union is a putative marriage and the property acquired during that union is quasi-marital property subject to division as community property. 

Read In re Marriage of Tejeda, No. H033001 [HTML]

Read In re Marriage of Tejeda, No. H033001 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed November 25, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge McAdams

Counsel
For Appellant:   Baskin & Grant, LLP, Caleb S. Baskin, Heidi Simonson

For Appellee:  Dolly Ares

Find a Lawyer

More Options