Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Oddone v. Sup. Ct., No. B213784

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on November 25, 2009 10:54 AM

In plaintiff's suit on behalf of her deceased husband against his former employer claiming that his brain tumor was caused by exposure to toxic chemicals while working for Technicolor, plaintiff's petition challenging an order sustaining defendant's demurrer to a claim that plaintiff was injured by exposure to toxic chemicals and vapors on her husband's clothing and person that he brought home is denied where Technicolor does not owe plaintiff a duty of due care, as plaintiff's attempts to state a cause of action fall short of the Rowland criteria. 

Read Oddone v. Sup. Ct., No. B213784 [HTML]

Read Oddone v. Sup. Ct., No. B213784 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed November 24, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Flier

Counsel
For Appellant:    Gonzalez & Robinson, Joseph D. Gonzalez and Keith A. Robinson

For Appellee:   Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp, Hayward J. Kaiser and Paul Guelpa

Find a Lawyer

More Options