California Case Law - The FindLaw California Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal Opinion Summaries Blog

People v. Phu, No. C060511.html

Trial court's order requiring defendant to pay $24,752.35 in restitution to the Municipal Utility District (MUD) after pleading no contest to conspiracy to sell marijuana is affirmed as, under the circumstances, it was reasonable to use the earlier date of when the defendant subscribed for utilities rather than the date when the MUD first determined that power was being illegally diverted into the house.    

Read People v. Phu, No. C060511 [HTML]

Read People v. Phu, No. C060511 [PDF]

Filed November 17, 2009


Opinion by Judge Nicholson

For Appellant:    J. Edward Jones

For Appellee:  Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General,  Michael P. Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Catherine Chatman and Raymond L. Brosterhous II, Deputy Attorneys General