Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

People v. Phu, No. C060511.html

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on November 18, 2009 2:30 PM

Trial court's order requiring defendant to pay $24,752.35 in restitution to the Municipal Utility District (MUD) after pleading no contest to conspiracy to sell marijuana is affirmed as, under the circumstances, it was reasonable to use the earlier date of when the defendant subscribed for utilities rather than the date when the MUD first determined that power was being illegally diverted into the house.    

Read People v. Phu, No. C060511 [HTML]

Read People v. Phu, No. C060511 [PDF]

Filed November 17, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Nicholson

Counsel
For Appellant:    J. Edward Jones

For Appellee:  Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General,  Michael P. Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Catherine Chatman and Raymond L. Brosterhous II, Deputy Attorneys General

Find a Lawyer

More Options