Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Sustainable Transp. Advocates of Santa Barbara v. Santa Barbara County Ass'n of Gov'ts, No. B212524

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on November 11, 2009 11:16 AM

Denial of plaintiff's petition for writ of mandate seeking to vacate the approval of Measure A, which imposes a retail sales and use tax to fund transportation projects in the county, is affirmed as a prior CEQA environmental review was not required as Measure A falls within the funding mechanism exclusion of the CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4) because it does not constitute a binding commitment to construct the projects set forth in the investment plan.     

Read Sustainable Transp. Advocates of Santa Barbara v. Santa Barbara County Ass'n of Gov'ts, No. B212524 [HTML]

Read Sustainable Transp. Advocates of Santa Barbara v. Santa Barbara County Ass'n of Gov'ts, No. B212524 [PDF]

Filed November 10, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Perren

Counsel

For Appellant:  Eugene S. Wilson

For Appellee:  Dennis Marshall, County Counsel, Kevin E. Ready, Sr., Senior Deputy County Counsel; Remy, Thomas, Moose and Manley, Whitman F. Manley, Tiffany K. Wright and Christopher J. Butcher

Find a Lawyer

More Options