Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Bates v. Rubio's Rest., Inc., No. G041231

By FindLaw Staff on December 02, 2009 1:26 PM

In a $7.5 million settlement agreement arising from a wage and hour class action lawsuit, trial court judge's order vacating an earlier ruling that the 140 late-identified class members should receive notice and then recusing himself from any further proceedings in the matter is affirmed where: 1) when a judge is not disqualified at the time of making the first ruling, the first ruling does not become void just because the judge later disqualifies himself in the interests of justice and encapsulates both rulings in one minute order; and 2) defendant's argument that the judge's order vacating the prior ruling about the 140 late-identified class members must be reversed is rejected.     

Read Bates v. Rubio's Rest., Inc., No. G041231 [HTML]

Read Bates v. Rubio's Rest., Inc., No. G041231 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed November 30, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Moore

Counsel
For Appellant:   Irell & Manella, Gregory R. Smith, Andra Barmash Greene and Julie M. Davis

For Appellee:  Righetti Law Firm, Matthew Righetti, John Glugoski; McInerney & Jones, Kevin J. McInerney, Kelly McInerney and Charles A. Jones

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options