Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Priceline.com Inc. v. City of Anaheim, No. G041338

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on January 06, 2010 10:36 AM

In plaintiff's request for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the City of Anaheim to litigate tax assessment proceedings without the assistance of outside counsel retained pursuant to a contingency fee agreement claiming that the fee arrangement violates a government lawyer's duty of neutrality, trial court's denial of the writ petition is affirmed as, Clancy does not bar contingency fee lawyers from assisting government lawyers as co-counsel in ordinary civil litigation such as this, and the tax assessment proceeding is a civil administrative action that does not require the delicate weighing of values described in Clancy.   

Read Priceline.com Inc. v. City of Anaheim, No. G041338 [HTML]

ReaD Priceline.com Inc. v. City of Anaheim, No. G041338 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed January 5, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Ikoa

Counsel
For Appellant:   Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, Darrel J. Hieber, Stacy R. Horth-Neubert, Daniel M. Rygorsky and Raoul D. Kennedy

For Appellee:   Cristina L. Talley, City Attorney, Moses W. Johnson, Assistant City Attorney

Find a Lawyer

More Options