Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

Kuish v. Smith, No. G040743

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on February 11, 2010 11:08 AM

In plaintiff's suit against defendants to recover $620,000 deposit after he unilaterally canceled escrow, arising from an agreement to purchase defendants' beach residence for $14 million, trial court's judgment in favor of defendants is reversed and remanded where: 1) in a rising market, the seller of real property is limited to the recovery of consequential damages and interest against the buyer who breached the purchase agreement; 2) defendants' retention of plaintiff's deposit in the circumstance of a rising market, presented here, constituted an invalid forfeiture under Freeman v. Rector; and 3) the trial court erred by concluding defendants were entitled to plaintiff's deposit as separate and additional consideration for defendants' agreements to extend escrow. 

Read   Kuish v. Smith, No. G040743  [HTML]

Read   Kuish v. Smith, No. G040743 [PDF]

Appellate Information

Filed February 10, 2010


Opinion by Judge Fybel

For Appellant:   Samuels, Green & Steel and Philip W. Green

For Appellee:  Prenovost, Normandin, Bergh & Dawe, Michael G. Dawe and Paula M. Harrelson

Find a Lawyer

More Options