California Supreme Court Chief Justice denounced cuts to the state judiciary budget as "a blow against justice" earlier this year, but a recent report suggests that that state should have made deeper cuts to the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), the central court bureaucracy that is frequently criticized for bad ideas and irresponsible spending.
The California court system lost $350 million through state budget cuts in the 2011-2012 fiscal year. According to the Judicial Council of California (Judicial Council) the legislature cut an additional $310 million from the State Court Facilities Construction Fund, which will delay some courthouse projects for up to year. Although the judiciary accounts for 2.88 percent of the state budget, the FY 2012 judiciary budget adjustments represent 3.5 percent of the state's budget solution.
Of the $350 million in California budget cuts, trial courts will suffer most with a proposed $319.3 million cut, including a one-time $183.5 million saving from delayed construction, technology, and non-critical projects according to the San Jose Mercury News. Other proposed budget cuts include $2.8 million from the Supreme Court, and $12.4 million from the appeals court. The AOC budget lost $13.4 million.
Even with the budget cuts, an AOC facilities report to the Judicial Council proposes staggering expenditures for a wishlist of trivial projects.
And this list goes on.
AOC spokesperson Teresa Ruano noted that all of the items on the list are awaiting approval, and the full list is beyond what the AOC will do over the next year with its $30 million budget, reports Courthouse News Service.
If this is how the AOC operates in the wake of California budget cuts, perhaps the state should consider eliminating the Administrative Office of the Courts next year and dedicating its budget to the suffering trial courts.