Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Does a mandated reporter have a duty to report abuse when he's responsible for that abuse?
According to a recent decision from California's Fifth Appellate District Court, the Fifth Amendment trumps the mandatory reporting law.
Kassey S. was sexually assaulted by Turlock Police Officer Jorge Cruz on multiple occasions when she was participating as a minor in the Turlock Police Department explorer program. The assaults took place during one-on-one ride alongs while Cruz was on duty. Kassey sued the City of Turlock and the Turlock Police Department, alleging that the City was vicariously liable for Cruz's negligence based on his failure to report the sexual abuse to a child protective agency.
The trial court sustained the City's demurrer, holding that the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act did not impose a "mandatory duty" on a mandated reporter to report his or her own acts of abuse since such a requirement would forfeit the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Since the mandatory duty was not breached -- and the alleged molestations took place outside the course and scope of Cruz's employment -- the court found the City could not be directly or vicariously liable for Cruz's actions.
Sadly, this isn't an uncharted area of the law. California's Fourth Appellate District ruled in Doe 1 v. City of Murrieta that a police department is not vicariously liable for the misconduct when a cop sexually assaults a minor participating in a police explorer program. Although the police officer is on duty, such misconduct does not come within the course and scope of the police officer's employment.
While Kassey acknowledged that the City couldn't be held vicariously liable for Cruz's first assault, she argued that the City was vicariously liable for Cruz's subsequent assaults based on his breach of duty to report his first assault. Kassey's reasoning was that both before and after the assaults, Cruz was acting within the scope of his duties as a police officer and had a mandatory duty to report his own misconduct
The appellate court disagreed, noting that it would not interpret the statute in a manner that would make it unconstitutional, (such as requiring self-incrimination).
While Kassey's argument was novel, the Fifth Amendment takes priority over mandatory reporting laws.