Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Czekalski v. LaHood, No. 08-5431

By FindLaw Staff on December 30, 2009 8:53 AM

In an action alleging that plaintiff's supervisor at the Federal Aviation Administration discriminated against her on the basis of sex by reassigning her to an inferior position, judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) the magistrate judge correctly instructed the jury on the relevant legal theory; and 2) plaintiff did not identify any evidence peculiarly available to defendant that it did not produce and that would shed light on her claim.

Read Czekalski v. LaHood, No. 08-5431

Appellate Information

Argued October 13, 2009

Decided December 29, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Henderson

Counsel

For Appellant:

Ellen K. Renaud, David H. Shapiro and Richard L. Swick, Swick & Shapiro, P.C., Washington, DC

For Appellee:

Darrell C. Valdez, Assistant United States Attorney, Washington, DC

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options