Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Hays v. Sebelius, No. 08-5508

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on December 22, 2009 10:51 PM

In an action by a Medicare Part B beneficiary challenging a decision by a regional Medicare contractor to reimburse for a particular drug only up to the price of its least costly alternative, summary judgment for plaintiff is affirmed where the Medicare Act unambiguously foreclosed that determination and required instead that Medicare pay for covered items or services at a statutorily prescribed rate.

Read Hays v. Sebelius, No. 08-5508

Appellate Information

Argued November 5, 2009

Decided December 22, 2009


Opinion by Judge Tatel


For Appellants:

Samantha L. Chaifetz, Mark B. Stern and Christopher C. Fonzone, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC

For Appellee:

Stuart M. Gerson and Robert E. Wanerman, Epstein Becker & Green LLP, Washington, DC

Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options