Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

US v. Tolliver, No. 08-3229

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on July 07, 2009 3:43 PM

Sentence for drug crimes is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not err in concluding defendant was not eligible for modification of his crack sentence under 18 U.S.C. sec. 3582(c) as his applicable Guidelines range was his career offender range and that range had not been lowered by Amendment 706; and 2) the court did not err in denying defendant's motion for a sentence reduction as his sentence was explicitly based on a stipulation between the parties and not on a sentencing range that had subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission. 

Read US v. Tolliver, No. 08-3229

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.
Submitted: June 10, 2009
Filed: July 7, 2009

Judges
Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

Find a Lawyer

More Options