Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

US v. Moore, No. 08-2812

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on September 11, 2009 5:03 PM

Defendant's identity theft sentence is affirmed where: 1) the district court could only consider the value of defendant's substantial assistance in reducing his mandatory two-year sentence for aggravated identity theft based on the government's 18 U.S.C. section 3553(e) motion; and 2) defendant did not file a motion for a departure nor request a departure orally at the sentencing hearing.

Read US v. Moore, No. 08-2812

Appellate Information

Submitted: May 15, 2009

Filed: September 11, 2009

Judges

Per Curiam

Find a Lawyer

More Options