Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

US v. Zuniga, No. 08-3156

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on September 01, 2009 3:23 PM

District court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress and motion to dismiss his indictment charging him with failure to register as a sex offender after traveling interstate commerce is affirmed where: 1) defendant's constitutional challenge to the federal Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) is rejected; 2) defendant lacks standing to raise a Tenth Amendment challenge to SORNA because he is a private party; 3) SORNA applies to defendant who traveled interstate after enactment of the Act but before the Attorney General issued the interim rule on the application of the Act.

Read US v. Zuniga, No. 08-3156

Appellate Information

Submitted: May 11, 2009

Filed: September 1, 2009

Judges

Per Curiam Opinion

Find a Lawyer

More Options