Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

US v. Curry, No. 09-1325

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on November 09, 2009 4:03 PM

Denial of defendant's motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2) is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in failing to explicitly state what sentence it would have imposed had Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines been in effect when defendant was originally sentenced; and 2) the district court's observation that defendant's 100-month sentence was the product of negotiation was an accurate reflection of the record and not speculation regarding what might otherwise have occurred.

Read US v. Curry, No. 09-1325

Appellate Information

Submitted: September 24, 2009

Filed: November 9, 2009


Opinion by Judge Wollman

Find a Lawyer

More Options