Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In an antitrust action alleging a conspiracy to monopolize the market for cardiology services for privately insured patients, dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where the complaint erroneously defined the product market by how consumers paid for cardiology services. In addition, a grant of plaintiff's motion to tax costs is affirmed where the district court did not err in declining to tax discovery related copying expenses.
Submitted: September 21, 2009
Filed: December 29, 2009
Opinion by Judge Melloy