Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Defendant's social security benefits fraud conviction is affirmed where: 1) the district court properly admitted defendant's loan application and letter into evidence as business records under Fed. R. Evid. 803(6); and 2) even assuming, without deciding, that the government's questions on cross-examination were plainly improper, the errors were not so prejudicial as to affect the outcome of the trial.
Submitted: September 25, 2009
Filed: December 16, 2009
Opinion by Judge Gruender