Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Search for legal issues
For help near (city, ZIP code or county)
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location

PRM Energy Sys., Inc. v. Primenergy, L.L.C., No. 08-1987

Article Placeholder Image
By FindLaw Staff on January 10, 2010 2:22 PM

In an action for tortious interference with, and inducement to breach, agreements regarding the development of a gasification technology, grant of defendant's motion to compel arbitration is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not err in its reliance on a concerted misconduct theory of alternative estoppel to grant defendant nonsignatory's motion to compel arbitration; and 2) in light of the interpretive preference for arbitration, plaintiff's tort claims were "disputes arising under" the agreements and were therefore within the scope of the broad arbitration clause.

Read PRM Energy Sys., Inc. v. Primenergy, L.L.C., No. 08-1987

Appellate Information

Submitted: October 15, 2008

Filed: January 8, 2010


Opinion by Judge Melloy

Find a Lawyer

More Options