Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

US v. Hamilton, No. 08-3233

By FindLaw Staff on January 13, 2010 2:52 PM

Defendant's child pornography conviction is affirmed where: 1) the officers who performed a warrantless search of defendant's home had reasonable suspicion to do so; and 2) there was no justification for applying the exclusionary rule based on a defect in a later search warrant, because the detective who prepared the warrant merely made a clerical error.

Read US v. Hamilton, No. 08-3233

Appellate Information

Submitted: April 17, 2009

Filed: January 13, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Hansen

Copied to clipboard

Find a Lawyer

More Options